Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
I. The Verses in Question.
The entrance into the inner chambers of covenantal reality begins with an encounter with the spoken words of Yehoshua, as preserved in the records of Yochanan (Yo-khah-nahn) — John. To approach these verses is to step onto a threshold between two worlds: one of a shadowed, institutional heritage and the other of a luminous, Inhabited authority. The journey commences with a greeting of three distinct textual presentations, each serving as a mirror that reflects the posture of the one who reads. The first encounter is through the lens of the contrived institutional narrative (CIN – Pronounced SIN a.k.a religion), a translation that has permeated the western mind for generations. In this version, the words are rendered as a promise of belief and a request for favor, appearing as a distant dialogue between a deity and a follower. This narrative has often left the seeker in a state of passive waiting, where the act of asking is seen as a hope for a gift rather than a claim of right. It presents a world where the power is external and the participation of the individual is limited to the boundaries of intellectual assent.
The second encounter moves closer to the ancient heartbeat, drawing from the witness of the Codex Sinaiticus (See-nah-ee-tee-koos) and Codex Vaticanus (Vah-tee-kah-noos). Here, the language shifts from the abstract to the concrete. The one who was once a believer is now revealed as one who places trust, and the works are identified as labors. This textual witness strips away the later ornaments of institutional tradition and places the reader back in the historical moment where the sound of the words carried the weight of physical reality. It is a transition from a theological concept to a lived experience, where the movement of Yehoshua toward the Father is seen as a physical traversal, an actual migration of the seat of authority from the visible dust of Yerushalayim (Yeh-roo-shah-lah-yeem) — Jerusalem to the invisible center of all production.
The third encounter is the foundational reconstruction of covenantal relational agency. This is the voice of the Indwelt, the Inhabited translator who recognizes that these verses are not merely information but a constitutional mandate. In this rendering, the standing of the individual is revealed as being reliant upon the very essence of the Son. The act of asking is unveiled as a legal requisition, a formal claim issued within the jurisdiction of a sovereign name. The response of the Son is not a casual favor but a personal labor to bring resources into existence. This foundational view collapses the distance created by centuries of institutional interference and restores the Indwelt to their rightful position at the right hand of power. To read these three together is to see the progression from a clouded memory to a clear, functional present.
John 14:12-14 (Sinaiticus/Vaticanus) Original: ἀμὴν ἀμὴν λέγω ὑμῖν ὁ πιστεύων εἰς ἐμέ τὰ ἔργα ἃ ἐγὼ ποιῶ κἀκεῖνος ποιήσει καὶ μείζονα τούτων ποιήσει ὅτι ἐγὼ πρὸς τὸν πατέρα πορεύομαι καὶ ὅ τι ἂν αἰτήσητε ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί μου τοῦτο ποιήσω ἵνα δοξασθῇ ὁ πατὴρ ἐν τῷ υἱῷ ἐάν τι αἰτήσητέ με ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί μου ἐγὼ ποιήσω
Transliteration: amen amen lego hymin ho pisteuon eis eme ta erga ha ego poio kakeinos poiesei kai meizona touton poiesei hoti ego pros ton patera poreuomai kai ho ti an aitesete en to onomati mou touto poieso hina doxasthe ho pater en to huio ean ti aitesete me en to onomati mou ego poieso
Literal Interlinear Etymological Transliteration (The L.I.E. Detector: Firmly-established firmly-established I-speak to-you the-one trust-placing into Me the labors which I produce and-that-one will-produce and greater of-these he-will-produce because I toward the Father traverse and whatever any-thing you-request inside the name of-Me this I-will-produce in-order-that he-may-be-rendered-heavy the Father inside the Son if any-thing you-request Me inside the name of-Me I will-produce. (John 14:12-14, Sinaiticus/Vaticanus, Covenantally Faithful, Minimal Copular, SVO Format)
The atmosphere of this greeting is one of profound significance, as if an ambassador were presenting their credentials before a high court. The repetition of the word amēn (ah-main) serves as the striking of a gavel, demanding the full attention of the Inhabited spirit. It signifies that what follows is not a suggestion or a metaphor, but a decree that is firmly established in the heavens and the earth. Imagine a traveler standing before a massive, ancient gate that has been overgrown with the vines of a long-forgotten language. The institutional narrative has provided a map that describes the gate but offers no key. The ancient witnesses begin to clear away the overgrowth, revealing the intricate carvings and the legal seals of the king. The foundational reconstruction then places the key into the hand of the traveler, demonstrating that the gate is not a barrier but a portal to the seat of production.
As the reader becomes acquainted with these texts, they must perceive the inherent tension between the contrived narrative and the covenantal reality. The institution has often used the word believe as a sort of psychological anchor, holding the individual in a harbor of safety where no actual movement is required. However, the ancient script uses a word that describes the action of a builder leaning their entire weight against a cornerstone. If the stone moves, the builder falls; if the stone is firm, the building rises. This is the posture of the Indwelt. It is not an assumption of truth but a reliance on a foundation that has been tested by the resurrection. The works mentioned are not theatrical displays of magic, but the erga (er-gah) — the labors and business of a royal house. A son does not perform “miracles” to entertain the servants; a son manages the estate to increase the glory of the father.
The movement of Yehoshua toward the Father is the pivot upon which the entire mechanism of the greater works turns. In the institutional mind, this departure is a sad farewell, a distance to be bridged by longing and ritual. In the covenantal mind, this is the executive promotion of the legal head. It is as if a foreman has left the construction site to enter the corporate office where the blueprints are held and the resources are authorized. His presence there is the guarantee that every requisition issued by the agents on the ground will be fulfilled. The “greater works” are not greater in quality than those of the Son, for no labor can exceed the perfection of His production, but they are greater in scope and distribution. The power is no longer concentrated in one physical location; it is now accessible through every Inhabited vessel acting in the legal authority of the Name.
The concept of the Name is the most critical element for the reader to grasp in this introduction. To the religious mind, the name is a label, a signature used to validate a petition. To the legal mind of the ancient world, the onoma (oh-no-mah) — name was the sum of a person’s character, authority, and credit. To act in the name of another was to possess their power of attorney. This is the difference between a beggar asking for a coin and a treasurer presenting a bond. The beggar asks from a position of lack, hoping for mercy. The treasurer requisitions from a position of standing, knowing the debt is already covered. This is why the Son promises that He will personally produce what is requested. He is the guarantor of the covenant, the one who ensures that the Father is rendered heavy with honor through the materialization of the Kingdom’s business.
The weight of honor, often translated as glory, is the physical evidence of the Father’s presence. When a requisition is made and the Son produces the labor, the result is a tangible increase of the Father’s reputation in the physical realm. It is like the arrival of a massive shipment of gold into a city; its presence changes the economy, provides for the poor, and demonstrates the wealth of the sender. This is the end goal of the requisition: that the Father might be seen as the ultimate source of all weight and value. The reader must understand that they are invited into a functional economy where their words, when aligned with the authority of the Son, become the triggers for divine production. This is the completed puzzle, the deeper message for the Indwelt today.
By greeting these verses, the audience is actually greeting their own identity. If the reader sees themselves as an outsider, the verses remain a mystery. If the reader sees themselves as a resident of the institutional narrative, the verses remain a passive promise. But if the reader sees themselves as the Inhabited agent of the King, these verses become a set of instructions for the operation of a global requisitioning system. The deep dive that follows will not merely explain these words; it will exhume the power that has been buried beneath the dust of tradition. It will require the audience to set aside the beggar’s rags of the institutional past and put on the robes of legal agency. The threshold has been crossed, and the court is now in session. The verses are no longer just on the page; they are the governing law of the inhabited spirit.
In the silence of this introduction, one can hear the echo of the ancient court. The tension between what was taught and what is written creates a spark of recognition. The indwelt spirit knows the difference between a story about power and the possession of power. As the series unfolds, the layers of the contrived institutional narrative will be stripped away until only the raw, pulsating authority of the Son remains. This is the prophetic excavation. It is the recovery of a lost inheritance. It is the moment where the “ask” becomes the “claim.” Every word is a brick in the wall of a new temple; a temple not made with hands but composed of those who stand-reliant on the Name. The invitation is clear: move past the greeting and enter into the labor.
