Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
I. Verse in question.
The proclamation of the transition from the antiquated to the unprecedented begins with a confrontation of the veil that has long obscured the structural reality of the cosmos. For centuries, the declaration found in the writings of Sha’ul (Shah-ool) — Paul the Apostle to the assembly at Korinthos (Ko-reen-thos) — Corinth has been flattened into a sentimental artifact of the Contrived Institutional Narrative (CIN – Pronounced SIN also known as Religion/Christianity). In this religious framework, the words are treated as a moral invitation or a psychological balm, suggesting a mere improvement of the human condition through a legalistic transaction. This institutional perspective, often pronounced as SIN, views the individual as a static object of a religious organization, where being in Christ is reduced to a status of membership or a title within a corporate hierarchy. The narrative suggests that a person undergoes a change in temperament or social standing, adhering to a set of doctrinal propositions that promise a future hope while leaving the current state of existence tethered to the same old structures of power and performance. This contrived narrative operates on the surface of the text, utilizing the term therefore as a mere transition in a sermon rather than a declaration of a binding result. It frames the new creature as a religious project, a work-in-progress that is constantly measured against institutional standards of piety. Under this lens, the old things passing away is interpreted as a personal struggle against bad habits or social taboos, a perpetual fight against a ghost that the institution claims has died but continues to haunt the hallways of the mind. The arrival of new things is relegated to an emotional experience or a distant promise, lacking the immediate, ontological force of a reality that has already emerged into existence.
This institutional veil acts as a filter, smoothing out the jagged edges of the Greek witness and replacing the raw, kinetic power of the original language with the polished, anachronistic terms of Western academic religion. It creates a posture of passivity where the listener is told they have been saved, yet they remain under the jurisdiction of the same antiquated systems that governed their life before. The tension between the institutional narrative and the covenantal reality is the very friction that allows for the sharpening of the indwelt. To understand the magnitude of what is truly being declared, one must step away from the contrived pews and look toward the foundation of the city. Consider a traveler who has spent their entire life within the walls of a decaying, famine-stricken province. They are told that they are now citizens of a distant, golden kingdom, yet they remain in the same house, eating the same dust, and obeying the same local tyrants. The institutional narrative is the paper certificate of citizenship that hangs on the wall of that crumbling house. It is a legal fiction that provides comfort but no change in jurisdiction. However, the message meant for the Indwelt today is not about a certificate; it is about the literal founding of a new province upon the very ground where the traveler stands. It is the arrival of a sovereign power that bypasses the local tyrant entirely, establishing a fresh settlement with its own laws, its own life-force, and its own reality. The old province has not been fixed; it has been passed beside. The traveler is no longer a subject of the famine; they are the founding members of the feast.
To begin contrasting the traditional English rendering of this passage with the structural, mechanical force present in the Codex Sinaiticus, it is helpful to place the two expressions side by side. The familiar translation reads:
“Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.”
Yet when the same statement is encountered in the primary Greek witnesses, its internal architecture becomes far more explicit. The scriptural witness in the Codex Sinaiticus demands a return to this structural understanding, stripping away the religious gloss to reveal the mechanical necessity of the change.
“ὥστε (hōste) — and so consequently — εἴ (ei) — if provided that — τις (tis) — anyone — ἐν (en) — within — Χριστῷ (Christō) — the inhabited one — καινὴ (kainē) — fresh — κτίσις (ktisis) — founding — τὰ (ta) — the — ἀρχαῖα (archaia) — original things — παρῆλθεν (parēlthen) — passed beside — ἰδοὺ (idou) — behold — γέγονεν (gegonen) — has emerged into existence — καινά (kaina) — fresh things.” (Codex Sinaiticus – 2 Korinthians 5:17).
This is the blueprint of a total environmental shift. The Inhabited One, the Iesous who is the audible frequency of Yehoshua, is the location of this new jurisdiction. To be within Him is not to join a group, but to be absorbed into the very substance of the Spirit that rubs and saturates the Son. It is a biological and spiritual integration that renders the former world-system obsolete. The institutional narrative focuses on the creature as a singular, isolated animal being reformed, but the Greek witness of ktisis speaks to the act of settling a city or founding a colony. This is not about the individual’s internal feelings; it is about the individual becoming the site of a fresh founding. The indwelt person is a beachhead of the Kingdom of YHWH, a sovereign territory where the laws of the antiquated world no longer apply.”
The failure of the contrived institutional narrative is its inability to grasp the permanence of the emergence. It treats the transformation as a fragile state that must be maintained through constant religious effort, effectively placing the agency back onto the individual rather than the completed work of the Inhabited One. This creates a cycle of performance and guilt, which is the hallmark of the religious world-system. In contrast, the covenantal reality declares that the fresh things have emerged into existence with the finality of a birth. Just as a child cannot return to the womb once it has emerged into the light, the fresh founding within the Indwelt cannot be undone. The logic of the Greek perfect tense, as witnessed by Dionysius Thrax, establishes an action that is finished in the past with results that are fixed for all time. The tension sensed by the modern seeker is the result of trying to live a resurrected, emergent life within the confines of an institutional cage. The cage tells you that you are new, but it keeps the door locked and the bars polished. The deep dive into the primary witness unlocks that door by revealing that the bars themselves are part of the original things that have been passed beside. The movement is from a narrative of membership to a reality of jurisdiction.
The antiquated things, the archaia, are not merely personal sins; they are the entire primitive world-system, including the religious structures that claim to speak for God while denying the power of the indwelling. These things have not just died; they have been bypassed. A ship does not need to destroy a rock in the ocean to move beyond it; it simply passes beside it, leaving the obstacle in its wake as it enters deeper waters. This is the posture of the Covenantal Relational Agency. The Indwelt do not spend their lives fighting the old nature or the old world; they recognize that they have been moved to a different frequency. The institutional struggle is a treadmill that keeps the believer running in place, but the covenantal walk is a progression into the fresh, unused territory of the Spirit. This founding is unused because it has no precedent in the human experience outside of Yehoshua. It is a new species of existence, a settling of the divine within the human frame that bypasses the need for institutional mediators.
To fully realize this integrated message for today, one must acknowledge that the contrived institutional narrative has served as a schoolmaster or a veil that is now being stripped away by the light of the true witness. The puzzle is being completed as the Indwelt move from being passive recipients of a story to active agents of a sovereign jurisdiction. The proclamation is clear: the transition is not a future hope, but a completed fact. The fresh things have not merely arrived; they have emerged from the very center of the being that is located within the Inhabited One. This is the end of the religious project and the beginning of the sovereign life. The call is to step out of the contrived institutional narrative and into the created, recognizing that the authority of the antiquated has been vacated. The settlement is founded, the landmarks have been passed, and the reality of the Kingdom of YHWH is the ground beneath the feet of those who hear the sound of Yehoshua.
As this deep dive progresses, the distinction between the performative piety of the institution and the organic agency of the covenant will become even more pronounced. The goal is to move beyond the graphical placeholders of the text and into the audible, living frequency of the Spirit. The contrived institutional narrative thrives on the silence of the Indwelt, keeping them dependent on the definitions provided by the corporate structure. But the Greek witness breaks that silence, providing the technical vocabulary of freedom. When the text declares that a fresh founding has occurred, it is a legal and spiritual eviction notice to every power and every system that seeks to maintain control over the human spirit. The Indwelt are the living evidence that the old world-system is a hollow shell, a primitive antiquity that has no place in the fresh, unprecedented reality of the now. This is the foundation upon which the remainder of this exploration is built—a total rejection of the contrived institutional narrative for the sake of the consecrated.
