Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
III. Posture and Ontological Framework:
The collision between the established institutional narrative and the ancient functional reality or covenantal relational agency necessitates a profound re-evaluation of the ontological framework through which the Inhabited perceive existence. One must recognize that the contrived institutional narrative presents a static and legalistic worldview, where the pursuit of goodness is reduced to a series of moral checkboxes. In this posture, good and evil are treated as abstract philosophical categories or distant objects that one must search for, much like a traveler looking for a landmark that exists outside of themselves. This narrative promises an existence that is merely biological, a passive state of being alive that lacks the dynamic power of the spirit. It creates a relationship with the divine that is conditional and reactive, where a deity is depicted as following the human lead, responding only to the self-reported righteousness of the religious community. This is a world of stagnant pools and dormant statues, where the requirements of the institution are mistaken for the movements of life.
In stark contrast, the covenantal relational agency version shifts the posture to active and concrete movement, replacing abstract morality with a kinetic reality. Within this framework, the concepts of functional and dysfunctional replace the subjective definitions of virtue and vice. Reality is understood through the lens of design; either something is working according to the purpose for which it was created, or it is broken and failing to produce. The directive to tread a path implies a continuous and intentional effort, an exercise of agency that transforms the seeker into a technician of the created order. Life is not a passive state but is defined as vigorous existence, a dynamic vitality that permeates every aspect of the physical and communal sphere. This is the difference between a person who studies the mechanics of a wheel and the one who actually turns it to move a load. The covenantal agency is the engine of the spirit, driving the Inhabited to align their lives with the functional blueprints of the heavens.
The linguistic choices within these two postures reveal the depth of the deception embedded in the institutional narrative. When the institution speaks of good, it often refers to a subjective moral feeling or a standard of niceness that is entirely detached from physical utility. However, the covenantal relational agency employs the term tov (tohv), which in the ancient pictographic context refers to that which produces a harvest or fulfills its intended purpose. It is the state of being fit for use. Just as a tool is considered good only if it can perform its task, so too is a life considered functional only if it manifests the design of the creator. To choose the functional is to prioritize that which sustains and builds, while the institutional version remains preoccupied with internal feelings and outward appearances that carry no weight in the realm of the spirit.
Furthermore, the institutional command to hate is often internalized as a psychological state of anger or an emotional resentment toward those deemed immoral. This internal friction serves no functional purpose and often leads to the very dysfunction it claims to oppose. The ancient witness, however, uses the term sin’u (seen-oo), which means to turn away with coldness. This is a physical orientation, the act of literally turning one’s back and removing the heat of attention from that which is broken or dysfunctional. It is the strategic withdrawal of life-force from a collapsing structure. By turning away with coldness, the Inhabited do not waste energy on emotional battles; they simply cease to provide the fuel that allows dysfunction to persist. This is a calculated move of the spirit, a redirection of focus toward that which can be redeemed and made functional once again.
The identification of the divine further separates these two worldviews. The contrived institutional narrative relies on titles of feudal nobility such as lord, which shifts the focus toward a hierarchy of institutional authority and human-like power structures. This language obscures the nature of the being who causes all things to exist. The covenantal relational agency restores the identification of YHWH (Yah-weh) as the Powers of Armies, or Elohei Tseva’ot (Eh-loh-hay tseh-vah-oht). This emphasizes the vast, organized forces of the creator that exist near and with the individual. It is an ontological statement of presence, suggesting that the Inhabited are surrounded by a massed host of functional authorities that are ready to move in alignment with the covenant. The relationship is not one of a servant to a distant king, but of a functional vessel aligned with a cosmic military precision.
Original: דִּרְשׁוּ טוֹב וְאַל רָע לְמַעַן תִּחְיוּ וִיהִי כֵן יהוה אֱלֹהֵי צְבָאוֹת אִתְּכֶם כַּאֲשֶׁר אֲמַרְתֶּם שִׂנְאוּ רָע וְאֶהֱבוּ טוֹב וְהַצִּיגוּ בַשַּׁעַר מִשְׁפָּט אוּלַי יֶחֱנַן יהוה אֱלֹהֵי צְבָאוֹת שְׁאֵרִית יוֹסֵף
Transliteration: deer-shoo tohv veh-ahl rah leh-mah-ahn teech-yoo vee-hee kane Yah-weh Eh-loh-hay tseh-vah-oht eet-teh-khem kah-ah-shair ah-mar-tem seen-oo rah veh-eh-hah-voo tohv veh-hah-tsee-goo bah-shah-ahr meesh-paht oo-lye yeh-kheh-nahn Yah-weh Eh-loh-hay tseh-vah-oht sheh-ay-reet Yoh-safe
Literal Interlinear Etymological Transliteration: Tread a path toward functional and not dysfunctional to the purpose that you shall have vigorous existence and thus shall YHWH Powers of Armies exist with you according to that which you have uttered turn away with coldness from dysfunctional provide for functional and cause a decision of justice to stand firm in the gate perhaps YHWH Powers of Armies will show favor to the flesh that remains of Yosef. (Aleppo/Leningrad – Amos – 5 – 14-15)
The contrast of justice and decision reveals the failure of the institutional gate. In the institutional posture, the goal is to establish justice as if it were a static monument or a law written in a book. It is viewed through the lens of a court system or a religious mandate, something that is settled and finished. Yet, the covenantal relational agency demands that the Inhabited cause a decision of justice to stand firm in the gate. The gate was the center of the community’s functional life, the place where every transaction was tested. To cause a decision to stand firm requires constant, active support. It is the image of a pillar that must be held upright against the pressures of corruption and decay. It is a communal action of upholding what is right in real-time, rather than a passive reliance on a justice system that has been outsourced to an institution. The Inhabited are the ones who must physically hold the decision upright, ensuring that the threshold of the community remains uncompromised.
When considering the remnant and the concept of graciousness, the institutional narrative often adopts a tone of pity or selective favor based on religious adherence. It portrays a deity being gracious to a group as a reward for their piety. The covenantal reality, however, speaks of showing favor, or chanan (khah-nahn), which in the pictographic sense means to provide a protected camp or a place of rest. This is a physical act of provision for the she’erit (sheh-ay-reet), the flesh that remains. The favor is not an emotional response from the divine but a functional necessity for the survivors of the house of Yosef (Yoh-safe) — Joseph. The name Yosef (Yoh-safe), meaning he adds, signifies that even in a state of being a remnant, the potential for multiplication and increase is preserved through the provision of a secure camp. The relational bond between the creator and the survivors is maintained through tangible, protective action that ensures the preservation of the covenantal lineage.
The superimposition of these two versions reveals a fundamental shift in posture. The institutional version keeps the individual in a state of perpetual seeking, always looking for an external standard of goodness that they can never quite reach. It is a narrative of exhaustion and performance. The covenantal version, however, empowers the individual with agency. It moves the focus from seeking to treading, from hating to turning away, and from establishing monuments to holding decisions upright. It replaces the religious “niceness” of the institution with the rugged utility of the ancient camp. The Inhabited do not wait for a deity to be gracious; they create a functional environment that invites the presence of the powers of armies. They do not hope for an abstract justice; they hold the decision of justice in their own hands at the gate of their own lives.
This comparison exposes the institutional narrative as a shell that has been emptied of its functional marrow. It uses the words of the prophets but strips them of their kinetic power, leaving behind a religion that is easy to manage but impossible to live. The ancient Hebrew voice, however, remains vibrant and demanding. It calls for a reconstruction of the human vessel, a turning of the back toward the dysfunctional religious systems that have for too long held the people in a state of passive survival. To embrace the covenantal relational agency is to step out of the sanctuary of structured devotion and onto the path of vigorous existence. It is to recognize that the gate is not a metaphor but a daily threshold where the decision of the spirit must be made to stand firm against the winds of institutional compromise.
The final validation of these findings is found in the fruit of the two postures. The institutional path leads to a dependency on the system and a stagnation of the spirit, while the covenantal path leads to the multiplication and survival of the remnant. The house of Yosef (Yoh-safe) — Joseph survives not because of its religious fervor, but because it has been provided with a functional camp in the midst of a dysfunctional world. The powers of the armies of YHWH move where there is order, where there is function, and where the decision of justice is held upright by the Inhabited. This is the message for the modern moment: the ancient mechanics are still in operation, and the choice between the contrived institutional narrative and the covenantal relational agency is the choice between entropy and life.
The transition from the institutional to the covenantal is the journey of the Inhabited today. It is the process of unlearning the moral checkboxes and relearning the laws of spiritual design. By treading the path of the functional, providing for that which is good, and turning away from the brokenness of the religious systems, the remnant ensures their vigorous existence. The decision of justice stands waiting at the gate, and the powers of YHWH are massed and ready. The only thing required is the exercise of the agency that was woven into the grand design from the beginning. The ancient scrolls have been excavated, the words have been broken down, and the path is now visible to all who have the courage to walk it.
