Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
I. The Verse in Question: Galatians 5:16: But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not carry out the desire of the flesh. NASB.
The invitation into the life of the spirit is the most exquisite promise offered by the contrived institutional narrative (CIN pronounced SIN also known as Religion/Christianity), a beckoning into a realm of serene moral triumph and structured sanctity. Within the hallowed halls of the Contrived Institutional Narrative, the individual known as a Believer—defined here as the religious, non-inhabited adherent who seeks the Source through the scaffolding of man—is presented with a vision of human existence that is both challenging and deeply comforting. This narrative constructs a world where the chaos of human impulse is met with the orderly progression of divine grace, channeled through the faithful adherence to the institution’s guidance. The Believer is encouraged to see their life as a canvas upon which the colors of virtue are carefully applied, layer by layer, under the watchful eye of a benevolent ecclesiastical structure. This is the polished veneer of the religious experience: a life that looks, smells, and sounds like the very essence of heaven, meticulously maintained to reflect the glory of the system that birthed it. It is a world of soft light and certain answers, where the path to righteousness is paved with the intentions of the heart and the steady habits of the devout. In this sanctuary of thought, the struggles of the soul are not seen as failures but as opportunities for the Contrived Institutional Narrative to demonstrate its efficacy, offering a restorative balm for every wound and a doctrinal solution for every doubt.
At the center of this seductive vista stands the profound exhortation found in the 1995 New American Standard Bible, a translation that has served as a cornerstone for the Believer seeking clarity in the modern age: “But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not carry out the desire of the flesh.” To the ears of the Believer, these words from Galatians 5:16 resonate with the authority of a royal decree and the warmth of a father’s counsel. They represent the ultimate goal of the religious journey—a state of being where the internal “Spirit” is marketed as the primary navigator, leading the soul away from the dark and turbulent waters of human frailty. This verse is the jewel in the crown of the contrived institutional narrative, a promise that victory is not only possible but expected for those who remain within the boundaries of the faith. It suggests a linear path of ascent, where the “walk” is a disciplined, rhythmic movement toward a horizon of holiness. The Contrived Institutional Narrative paints this walk as a communal endeavor, a parade of the faithful moving in unison toward the heart of the Supreme Source, guided by the steady hand of tradition and the illuminating power of the Word. It is a beautiful, cohesive vision of a life redeemed, a proclamation that the “flesh”—that pesky remnant of the lower self—can be systematically neutralized by the superior power of a well-ordered spiritual life.
Within this framework, the Indwelt—defined here as the inhabited, spirit-animated participant of the covenant—is held up by the institution as an unattainable ideal or a curated exhibit toward which every Believer must strive. The Indwelt is portrayed by the narrative as the one who has successfully harmonized their internal world with the external requirements of the Covenantal Relational Agency, creating a seamless integration of belief and behavior. The narrative portrays this state as the ultimate peace, a “sabbath of the soul” where the “desires of the flesh” no longer hold sway because the “Spirit” has been given its rightful place as the master of the house. This is the seductive power of the institution: it offers a version of the Indwelt that is recognizable, manageable, and highly attractive. It is the image of a person who is always kind, always patient, and always in control—a living testament to the transformative power of the Contrived Institutional Narrative. This individual is the “gold standard” of the pews, the one whose life serves as a mirror for others to check their own spiritual progress. The institution markets this transformation as the natural byproduct of staying the course, of participating in the life of the community, and of leaning into the “Spirit” through the prescribed means of grace that the Contrived Institutional Narrative alone can provide.
However, this presentation serves a much darker strategic purpose within the religious scaffolding. By dangling the state of the Indwelt as a far-off goal, the contrived institutional narrative ensures that the Believer remains in a state of perpetual powerlessness. The Believer, lacking the genuine Inhabitation of the Spirit breath of the Father, is kept dependent on the institution for their spiritual oxygen. The narrative intentionally obscures the reality that the Indwelt exists in a state of superposition with the Father, the breath, and the Son—a real-deal unity that transcends all man-made structures. The Contrived Institutional Narrative strives to prevent the Believer from ever truly ascending into this state of Inhabitation, for such an ascent would immediately negate the narrative’s control. If the Believer were to become the Indwelt, the scaffolding of man would become visible for the hollow shell that it is. Thus, the institution must maintain the veneer; it must keep the Believer busy with the performance of walking, while ensuring they never actually catch the wind.
The beauty of this institutional proclamation is its apparent simplicity and its promise of total resolution. It suggests that the conflict between the “Spirit” and the “flesh” is a war that can be won through the right combination of surrender and effort. The Believer is told that if they simply “walk”—a term the narrative imbues with connotations of steady, faithful practice—the “not carrying out” of the flesh’s desires will follow as a logical and inevitable consequence. It is a spiritual law of cause and effect that provides the Believer with a sense of agency and purpose, yet it is an agency strictly bounded by the rules of the house. The Contrived Institutional Narrative reinforces this by providing the tools for the walk: the liturgies, the studies, the accountability groups, and the moral frameworks that define what the “Spirit” looks like in action. It is a comprehensive ecosystem of holiness, a garden where the “Spirit” is the sun and the Believer is the plant, growing toward the light under the careful cultivation of the institution. This vision is profoundly seductive because it offers a sense of belonging to something ancient, powerful, and ultimately successful. It tells the Believer that they are part of a grand story, a cosmic drama where the Covenantal Relational Agency is presented as a manageable force that ensures the final victory of light over darkness, both in the world and in the individual heart.
Consider the elegance of this institutional architecture. Just as a grand cathedral is designed to lift the eyes of the viewer toward the heavens, the contrived institutional narrative is designed to lift the aspirations of the Believer toward an idealized version of themselves. Every element of the narrative—from the way it interprets the “Spirit” to the way it categorizes the “flesh”—is intended to create a sense of awe and a desire for participation. The “walk” is not presented as a lonely trek through a wilderness, but as a dignified procession through a manicured estate. The “Spirit” is not a wild, unpredictable wind, but a steady, reliable current that flows through the established channels of the church. The “flesh” is not an inherent part of the human structure to be understood, but a collection of externalized “desires” that can be discarded like old clothes once the “Spirit” provides a new wardrobe. This is the polished surface of the mirror, reflecting a reality where everything is in its place and everyone knows their role. It is a world where the graphical placeholder Iesous is the smiling patron of the institution, the one who makes the “walk” possible and the “victory” certain. In this narrative, the names of the ancient witnesses are honored not for their disruptive power, but for their ability to provide a foundation for the current institutional order.
When שאול – Sha’ul (shah-ool) — Paul is mentioned in this context, he is framed as the ultimate architect of this spiritual system, the one who laid out the rules for the Believer to follow. His words in the Codex Sinaiticus are treated as the blueprints for a life of institutional excellence. The Contrived Institutional Narrative views his instruction to “walk by the spirit” as the definitive manual for moral management. In the eyes of the institution, שאול – Sha’ul (shah-ool) — Paul is the hero of the faith who successfully navigated the tensions of the human experience and left behind a map for all to follow. The Believer looks to him as the prototype of the Indwelt, the one who had his “desires” so thoroughly subjugated by the “Spirit” that he could say with confidence that he no longer lived, but the “Spirit” lived in him. This is the narrative’s greatest triumph: the transformation of a radical, pneumatic reality into a reproducible model of religious behavior. It takes the fire of the original experience and contains it within the hearth of the Contrived Institutional Narrative, where it can provide warmth without the danger of burning the house down. It presents a version of שאול – Sha’ul (shah-ool) — Paul that is sanitized and safe, a man whose zeal for the covenant has been repurposed into a zeal for the institution.
The Covenantal Relational Agency is thus presented as a partnership between the individual and the divine, facilitated by the institution. It is a covenantal relational agency because it is marketed as requiring the Believer’s active consent and cooperation; it is the Covenantal Relational Agency because it is claimed to be backed by the unbreakable promises of the Source, as interpreted by the Contrived Institutional Narrative. This agency is described as the engine that drives the “walk,” the power that enables the Believer to say “no” to the flesh and “yes” to the spirit. The institution promises that through this agency, the very nature of the individual is being slowly and surely refined, like silver in a refiner’s fire, until only the pure reflection of the institutional ideal remains. This is the polished and seductive form of the narrative—a promise of perfection that is always just within reach, a goal that keeps the Believer engaged, invested, and dependent on the system that defines the goal in the first place. The “desire of the flesh” is the dragon that the “Spirit” helps the Believer to slay every day, a heroic struggle that gives the religious life its drama and its sense of high stakes. It is a performance of power that masks a fundamental lack of life, ensuring the Believer never realizes that the “Spirit” they chase is a mere facsimile of the Father’s breath.
In this seductive introduction, we must also acknowledge the role of Yehoshua as He is presented within the Contrived Institutional Narrative. He is the ultimate Indwelt, the one in whom the Covenantal Relational Agency was perfectly realized. The narrative presents him as the bridge between the human and the divine, the one who made the “walk” possible for all who follow him. However, in the institutional mind, Yehoshua is often reduced to a theological necessity—the one who “paid the price” so that the “Spirit” could be made available to the Believer. He is the figurehead of the Contrived Institutional Narrative, the name that is invoked to sanctify the institution’s goals and to authorize its demands. The “walk” of the Believer is seen as an imitation of his walk, a pursuit of His character, and an adherence to His teachings as filtered through the lens of the institution. This creates a powerful emotional bond between the Believer and the narrative, as the pursuit of spiritual victory becomes a pursuit of Yehoshua himself, or at least the version of him that the Contrived Institutional Narrative has so carefully curated. This curated image is the cornerstone of the scaffolding, the beautiful face of an empty shell designed to keep the Believer looking at the image rather than becoming the reality.
The “walk by the Spirit” is therefore the rhythm of the institutional life. It is the sound of feet on the pavement of the “right path,” the feeling of being in sync with the “will of God” as defined by the leaders and the doctrines of the church. The contrived institutional narrative tells the Believer that this walk is the source of all joy, all peace, and all meaning. It is the escape from the “desire of the flesh,” which is portrayed as a dark and lonely prison. The “Spirit,” by contrast, is a wide-open field of light and liberty—provided, of course, that one stays within the fences of the field. The seduction is complete when the Believer truly believes that their freedom is found in their submission to the narrative, and that their “victory” over the flesh is a result of their commitment to the institution. This is the mirror we are holding up: a vision of spiritual life that is so complete, so coherent, and so attractive that one might never think to look behind the curtain. It is the veneer in its most perfect state, a masterpiece of religious craftsmanship that promises everything the human heart longs for while keeping it firmly within the grasp of the Contrived Institutional Narrative.
As this proclamation of the institutional ideal concludes, it leaves the Believer standing at the threshold of a promised land, looking out over a landscape of moral clarity and spiritual success. The words “walk by the Spirit, and you will not carry out the desire of the flesh” hang in the air like a golden promise, a final assurance that the Covenantal Relational Agency is working exactly as it should within the Contrived Institutional Narrative. This is the peak of the mountain, the place where the air is thin and the view is spectacular. From here, the “flesh” looks small and manageable, and the “Spirit” looks vast and all-encompassing. The Believer is invited to rest in this vision, to take pride in their progress, and to trust that the institution which brought them here will lead them the rest of the way. This is the introduction to our deep dive—a thorough and comprehensive presentation of the narrative’s most seductive form, the beautiful mask that hides the reality we are about to explore. We have painted the picture of the “perfect walk,” the “ideal Indwelt,” and the “victorious Believer,” all within the safe and sterile confines of the Contrived Institutional Narrative. This is the reflection in the mirror; we have admired the scaffolding, we have praised the paint, and we have bowed before the shell. Now, having seen the veneer in its full splendor, we stand ready to witness what happens when the first crack appears and the reality of Inhabitation begins to bleed through.
