Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
I. The Verse In Question: Matthew 7:7-8 Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened.
The spiritual landscape offered by the contrived institutional narrative (the narrative) is a masterwork of religious architecture, a sprawling and magnificent estate designed to offer the Believer—defined here as the religious, non-inhabited adherent who seeks the Source through the scaffolding of man—a sense of profound equilibrium and divine favor. Within the meticulously maintained grounds of the Contrived Institutional Narrative (the institution), the soul is invited to partake in a journey of rhythmic devotion and moral ascent, where every question is met with a polished answer and every yearning is channeled into the steady, reliable currents of tradition. This narrative constructs a reality that is as aesthetically pleasing as it is psychologically comforting, presenting a version of the spiritual life that is scrubbed of its raw, disruptive power and replaced with a sanitized, manageable holiness. The Believer is encouraged to view their existence through the stained glass of institutional consensus, where the light of the Father is softened and diffused into a spectrum of predictable virtues and ecclesiastical duties. It is a world of quiet pews and certain liturgies, a sanctuary where the chaos of the human condition is smoothed over by the constant application of a theological veneer that promises intimacy with the Divine while carefully maintaining the structural distance required for institutional control. This is the ultimate seduction of the religious man-made scaffolding: it offers a life that bears all the outward markings of the Spirit-breath—the language, the gestures, the emotional resonance—while remaining entirely contained within the hollow shell of human effort and academic abstraction.
At the heart of this radiant and deceptive vista stands the iconic promise found in the 1995 New American Standard Bible, a text that the institution utilizes as a primary instrument of its allure:
“Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened.”
To the ears of the Believer, these words from מתתיהו – Mattityahu (Maht-tee-yah-hoo) — Matthew 7:7-8 ring out like the clear peal of a cathedral bell, summoning the powerless to a state of perpetual, hopeful petition. The Contrived Institutional Narrative (CIN pronounced SIN also known as Religion/Christianity) markets this passage as the “Golden Key” to a life of divine provision, portraying the act of asking as a simple, heartfelt request to a benevolent Patron who delights in rewarding the piety of His subjects. Within this framework, the “walk” of the Believer is defined by a series of gentle entreaties and patient waiting, a spiritual performance where the “asking” is a psychological balm and the “seeking” is a lifelong pursuit of religious milestones. The institution paints a picture of a wide-open door that is always just one more prayer, one more service, or one more act of faith away from swinging wide. It is a cohesive and compelling vision of a life where the “seeking” is a communal journey of the pews, a shared quest for a horizon of blessing that the Contrived Institutional Narrative promises to facilitate through its various programs, studies, and moral frameworks.
Within this seductive framework, the Indwelt—defined here as the inhabited, spirit-animated participant of the covenant who exists in a superposition with the Father, the Breath, and the Word (Yehoshua), is held up by the narrative as a curated exhibit of what is possible if one only adheres more strictly to the scaffolding of man. The Indwelt is portrayed by the institution not as a current functional reality for all, but as the “saintly” ideal, the one who has mastered the art of “knocking” according to the institutional rhythm. The narrative presents this state as the ultimate religious success, a life where the Covenantal Relational Agency has been domesticated and put on display as a testament to the institution’s efficacy. This is the seductive power of the Contrived Institutional Narrative: it offers a counterfeit version of the Indwelt (Jesus) that is recognizable, safe, and entirely compliant with the needs of the system. It is the image of a person whose “seeking” has resulted in a quiet, unassuming piety that never threatens the status quo of the religious man-made scaffolding. The institution markets this transformation as the natural byproduct of staying the course, of leaning into the “Spirit” through the prescribed rituals that the Contrived Institutional Narrative alone is authorized to administer. This individual becomes the “gold standard” of the religious community, a mirror in which the powerless Believer is taught to see their own deficiency, ensuring they never look past the mirror to see the Inhabitation itself (Yehoshua).
However, this magnificent presentation serves a deeper, more strategic purpose within the religious scaffolding. By framing the “asking, seeking, and knocking” as a linear progression of religious effort, the contrived institutional narrative ensures that the Believer remains in a state of perpetual, localized dependence. The Believer, lacking the genuine Inhabitation of the Spirit breath of the Father, is kept in a cycle of seeking but never truly finding the door, for the institution has built its walls over the very threshold it claims to guard. The narrative intentionally obscures the reality that the Indwelt exists in a state of functional union with the Word—a real-deal authority that transcends the need for institutional mediation. The Contrived Institutional Narrative must maintain this veneer of “seeking” as a goal in itself, for if the Believer were to actually find the structural shift and become the Indwelt, the entire scaffolding of man would be exposed as a redundant and empty shell. Thus, the institution must keep the Believer busy with the performance of knocking on decorative doors, ensuring they never recognize the vibrational frequency of the Father’s breath within their own being that can ONLY be accessed through the Name Yehoshua.
The beauty of this institutional proclamation lies in its promise of a resolved and orderly life. It suggests that the mysteries of the heavens can be accessed through the simple, rhythmic application of institutionalized “faith.” The Believer is told that if they simply “ask”—a term the narrative strips of its judicial weight and fills with sentimental longing—the “giving” will follow as a reward for their persistence in the pews. It is a spiritual law of cause and effect that provides the powerless with a sense of agency, yet it is an agency that never challenges the authority of the narrative. The Contrived Institutional Narrative reinforces this by providing the “stones” that it calls “bread”—the theological abstractions and academic glosses that look like sustenance but offer no life to the spirit-animated participant. It is a comprehensive ecosystem of religious comfort, a garden where the “asking” is the rain and the Believer is the flower, growing in a pot that is carefully moved and watered by the institution. This vision is profoundly seductive because it offers a sense of participation in a cosmic drama while ensuring the individual remains a spectator to their own potential Inhabitation.
Consider the elegance of this institutional architecture. Just as a grand cathedral is designed to lift the eyes of the viewer toward the heavens while keeping their feet firmly on the church floor, the contrived institutional narrative is designed to lift the aspirations of the Believer toward an idealized version of “seeking” while keeping their agency bound to the system. The “knocking” is not presented as a forceful strike against a jurisdictional barrier, but as a polite, repetitive tap that demonstrates one’s “humility” before the religious authorities. The “door” is not a transition into a new mode of operation, but a gateway to further institutional inclusion. The “finding” is not the discovery of one’s own standing in the Covenantal Relational Agency, but the finding of a comfortable place within the Contrived Institutional Narrative. This is the polished surface of the mirror, reflecting a reality where the graphical placeholder “Iesous” is the benevolent doorman of the institution, the one who ensures that the “asking” is always rewarded with more of the same religious scaffolding. In this narrative, the names of the ancient witnesses are invoked to provide a sense of historical weight to the current institutional order, their radical experiences filtered through centuries of western anglicized academia until they are safe enough to be taught in a Sunday school.
When מתתיהו – Mattityahu (Maht-tee-yah-hoo) — Matthew is mentioned in this context, he is framed as the ultimate recorder of these spiritual laws, the one who transcribed the rules for the Believer to follow. His words in the Codex Vaticanus are treated as the blueprints for a life of religious excellence. The Contrived Institutional Narrative views his record of the command to “ask, seek, and knock” as the definitive manual for moral and material requisition. In the eyes of the institution, מתתיהו – Mattityahu (Maht-tee-yah-hoo) — Matthew is the faithful servant who provided the Believer with the vocabulary of prayer. The Believer looks to him as the prototype of the faithful petitioner, the one who documented the promise so that the institution could market it. This is the narrative’s greatest triumph: the transformation of a functional, pneumatic command into a reproducible model of religious behavior. It takes the fire of the original exhortation and contains it within the fireplace of the Contrived Institutional Narrative, where it can be admired without the risk of starting a structural revolution. It presents a version of מתתיהו – Mattityahu (Maht-tee-yah-hoo) — Matthew that is sanitized and safe, a man whose zeal for the kingdom has been repurposed into a zeal for the preservation of the narrative.
The Covenantal Relational Agency is thus presented as a partnership between the individual and the divine, mediated entirely by the institution. It is marketed as the “Covenantal Relational Agency” because it claims to be the only legitimate way for the Believer to interact with the Source, yet it is an agency that is perpetually under the oversight of the Contrived Institutional Narrative. This agency is described as the mechanism that ensures the “giving” and the “finding,” a power that is accessed through the correct performance of the institution’s requirements. The institution promises that through this agency, the life of the Believer is being slowly and surely improved, their “requests” being heard and their “needs” being met, so long as they remain within the safe confines of the religious man-made scaffolding. This is the polished and seductive form of the narrative—a promise of provision that keeps the Believer engaged, invested, and ultimately powerless. The “seeking” is the journey that never ends, a heroic pursuit of the Divine that gives the religious life its sense of purpose while ensuring the seeker never actually arrives at the threshold of the Inhabitation.
In this seductive introduction, we must also acknowledge the role of the graphical placeholder Iesous as He is presented within the Contrived Institutional Narrative (Jesus). He is the one who spoke the words, the one who validated the “asking,” and the one who promised the “opening.” The narrative presents Him as the bridge that makes the request possible. However, in the institutional mind, Jesus is often reduced to a theological figurehead—the one who “authorized” the institution to manage the door. He is the name that is invoked to sanctify the “seeking” and to justify the “knocking” as it is defined by the narrative. The “ask” of the Believer is seen as an imitation of His relationship with the Father, yet it is a relationship that the institution claims can only be understood through its own doctrinal lens. This creates a powerful emotional bond between the Believer and the narrative, as the pursuit of “finding” becomes a pursuit of Iesous Himself, or at least the version of Him that the Contrived Institutional Narrative has so carefully curated (Jesus). This curated image is the cornerstone of the scaffolding, the beautiful face of an empty shell designed to keep the Believer looking at the image rather than stepping through the door to become the Indwelt.
The “Ask, Seek, and Knock” is therefore the rhythm of the institutional life. It is the sound of voices in unison, the feeling of being part of a “great tradition” that has been asking and seeking for two thousand years. The contrived institutional narrative tells the Believer that this rhythm is the source of all peace and all security. It is the escape from the “aloneness” of the human condition, offering a seat at the table of the faithful—provided, of course, that one eats the “stone” provided by the institution. The seduction is complete when the Believer truly believes that their connection to the Father is dependent on their adherence to the narrative, and that their “finding” is a result of their commitment to the institution. This is the mirror we are holding up: a vision of spiritual life that is so complete, so coherent, and so attractive that the Believer never thinks to look for the rot beneath the veneer. It is the gold-plated cage in its most perfect state, a masterpiece of religious craftsmanship that promises everything the human heart longs for while keeping it firmly within the grasp of the Contrived Institutional Narrative.
As this proclamation of the institutional ideal concludes, it leaves the Believer standing at the threshold of a promised opening, looking out over a landscape of spiritual potential. The words “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you” hang in the air like a shimmering mirage, a final assurance that the Covenantal Relational Agency is working exactly as it should within the safe harbor of the Contrived Institutional Narrative. This is the peak of the institutional mountain, the place where the view is grand and the scaffolding feels like solid rock. From here, the “asking” feels like power and the “seeking” feels like progress. The Believer is invited to rest in this vision, to take pride in their devotion, and to trust that the institution which taught them to knock will eventually show them the door. This is the introduction to our deep dive—a thorough and comprehensive presentation of the narrative’s most seductive form, the beautiful mask that hides the functional reality we are about to explore. We have painted the picture of the “perfect seeker,” the “faithful asker,” and the “persistent knocker,” all within the sterile confines of the Contrived Institutional Narrative. This is the reflection in the mirror; we have admired the scaffolding, we have praised the paint, and we have bowed before the shell. Now, having seen the veneer in its full splendor, we stand ready to witness the first crack as we apply the L.I.E. Detector to the actual words of the Codices.
αἰτεῖτε καὶ δοθήσεται ὑμῖν ζητεῖτε καὶ εὑρήσετε κρούετε καὶ ἀνοιγήσεται ὑμῖν πᾶς γὰρ ὁ αἰτῶν λαμβάνει καὶ ὁ ζητῶν εὑρίσκει καὶ τῷ κρούοντι ἀνοιγήσεται
Transliteration: aiteite kai dothēsetai hymin zēteite kai heurēsete krouete kai anoigēsetai hymin pas gar ho aitōn lambanei kai ho zētōn heuriskei kai tō krouonti anoigēsetai Phonetic: (ahee-teh-ee-teh kahee doth-ay-set-ahee hoo-meen dzay-teh-ee-teh kahee hew-ray-set-eh kroo-et-eh kahee an-oy-gay-set-ahee hoo-meen pas gar ho ahee-tone lam-ban-ee kahee ho dzay-tone hew-rees-kee kahee toe kroo-on-tee an-oy-gay-set-ahee)
Literal Interlinear Etymological Transliteration (The L.I.E. Detector): Continue bringing your formal petition before the rightful Authority — asserting your claim, presenting your case, and persisting in your appeal, and it will be bestowed to you; seek and you will obtain; knock and it will be opened to you. For everyone the continuing to bring a formal petition before the rightful Authority — asserting a claim, presenting a case, and persisting in an appeal, receives, and the seeking finds, and to the knocking it will be opened.
Ματθαῖος – Matthaios (Math‑THAI‑os) — Matthew 7:7-8, Codex Vaticanus/Sinaiticus)
