Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A message to the Indoctrinated…
From the first breath of the human story, the rhythm of creation was never about religion, ritual, or hierarchy. It was about function—divine function. The account of Genesis was not a primitive myth or a quaint moral tale; it was the blueprinted unveiling of how life replicates life, how two elements of divine design fuse to continue the breath of Yahweh in the physical realm. The Genesis record is the operating system of creation itself. When Yahweh said, “Be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth, and subdue it,” He was not giving a poetic blessing—He was issuing a command that encoded biological, spiritual, and cosmic law. It was the divine activation sequence, the moment when the prototype human became the instrument of continuation. The instruction of Genesis 1:28 is the commission: go forth, fill, bring forth, rule through stewardship. Genesis 2:24 is the mechanical application of that law: how it is to be done, the function through which it is to be sustained. One gives the purpose, the other reveals the process. Together they form the architecture of human union—the first and perfect covenant of multiplication.
In Genesis 1:28, Yahweh speaks directly into the living blueprint, commanding humanity to be fruitful and multiply. The command itself carries the seed of reproduction, both physical and spiritual. This is not simply a biological urge to populate but a directive to carry divine consciousness forward through generations. The commission is the heartbeat of creation—the breath of Yahweh echoing through human flesh to fill the earth with His image and likeness. The command assumes the mechanism already exists; the tools are already in the design. It does not invent reproduction—it activates it. Yahweh had already embedded the mechanics of union in the human form, just as He embedded photosynthesis in plants and gravitational harmony in the stars. The command awakens what was already coded.
Genesis 2:24 then becomes the natural continuation of that same design, the manifestation of the law of multiplication. The verse says, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother, and shall cling to his woman, and they shall become to one.” The simplicity of that statement hides the magnitude of its power. “Therefore”—a word of consequence—anchors the verse in direct relation to what came before. Because of the correspondence recognized in Genesis 2:23—bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh—this therefore declares a new covenantal alignment. The man leaves, the two cling, and they become to one. It is not metaphor; it is the literal description of procreation and the law of continuation. Two human forms, designed in polarity, become to one—meaning, they produce a child. The mathematics of divine biology is written right into the verse: two become to one, two divided by two equals one. Life proceeds through the joining of opposites, and out of that joining comes a third—the manifest continuation of the image of Yahweh in flesh. This is not symbolic marriage; this is the literal operation of life.
To understand this correctly is to see the design mirrored in Yahweh Himself. The Trifecta of Creation unfolds through every layer of reality. Two people—man and woman—stand as the visible reflection of the invisible Creator, one love flows between them as the unifying force, and one child is born as the manifestation. This is not mere poetry; it is pattern. The same design exists in the Godhead: Source, Expression, Connection. Father, Word, Breath. The two realities of Genesis—command and mechanism—mirror heaven and earth. The Father gives the command; creation fulfills it. Heaven speaks; earth echoes. The masculine and feminine are not social genders but cosmic poles of creation’s current. The two together form one circuit, and through that circuit flows the power that multiplies life. When humanity fulfills the commission of Genesis 1:28 through the mechanism of Genesis 2:24, it literally mirrors the creative act of Yahweh Himself—life birthing life, breath generating breath.
The linguistic record confirms that what has been read as marriage and wife in modern Bibles is not only incorrect but chronologically impossible. Genesis was written between approximately 1400 and 1000 BCE. At that time, the Hebrew words ʾîš and ʾiššâ simply meant “man” and “woman.” They described identity in function—male and female beings of the same divine origin—without any implication of institution, ownership, or ceremony. The words had nothing to do with contracts, property, or civil structures; they spoke of corresponding design, not human hierarchy. It was not until between about 1200 and 900 BCE, roughly two to five centuries later, that the term ʾiššâ began to carry new social overtones. Even then, it described a household partner, not a legally bound spouse. There was still no concept of marriage as we know it today. The covenant remained divine, not human. By around 300 BCE, Greek translators in the Septuagint rendered the Hebrew ʾiššâ as gynē, a term that meant “woman.” It later absorbed the term wife when it was invented in human society. The overlap began to blur the purity of the original meaning. When the Latin Vulgate appeared around 400 CE, translators chose uxor and mulier, words that carried a distinctly legal tone, introducing for the first time the notion of the female spouse as an established role. Finally, by around 900 CE—nearly three thousand years after Genesis 2:24 was written—the English word wife appeared, carrying all the social and religious baggage of post-Roman civilization.
The gap between 1400 BCE and 900 CE is almost three full millennia. To take the word “wife,” a product of medieval legal systems, and insert it into a verse written thousands of years before such ideas existed, is the equivalent of placing a smartphone in Adam’s hand while he names the animals. It is anachronism at its most absurd. It is like claiming Noah built the ark with power tools or that Moses signed the Ten Commandments with a pen. The timeline itself exposes the impossibility. The text of Genesis belongs to a world untouched by human institution; it speaks of function, not contract. The insertion of “wife” or “marriage” is not translation—it is time travel gone wrong, dragging a man-made word backward through thousands of years and forcing it into the mouth of Yahweh as if He spoke through the language of bureaucracy. It is a historical and linguistic trespass, transforming divine biology into social control.
What Genesis 1:28 and 2:24 truly are, then, is a record of design and command. They are the articulation of how life continues and why it must. They are the biological and spiritual laws of multiplication spoken directly into the human condition. Yahweh did not invent ceremony; He breathed continuation. When He said be fruitful and multiply, He embedded within the human frame the mechanics to carry out that order. The act of clinging and becoming to one is the literal continuation of that same command. The two passages are inseparable—one gives the command to fill, the other gives the method to fill. They are not about weddings or contracts; they are about creation in motion. Two people, made in divine correspondence, come together to generate new life. That is the divine equation. It is the fulfillment of the creative will of Yahweh, the living pulse of Genesis itself.
What these verses are not is equally vital to state without hesitation. They are not a declaration of marriage as holy institution. They are not a reference to a wife as a legal or social title. They are not a depiction of ceremony, vow, or covenant bound by human law. None of those things existed when Genesis was written. To pretend otherwise is to collapse history into illusion. The Hebrew language did not know such constructs, and Yahweh did not author them. They arose from human culture centuries and millennia later. The claim that marriage and wife originate in Genesis is linguistic fraud—an anachronism dressed as theology. To read Genesis 2:24 as a marriage verse is to read the Creator’s first law of life as if it were a priest’s legal document. The distance between those two ideas is as wide as the distance between Eden and empire. Marriage, as the world defines it, is a man-made contract—a social management system born of property, politics, and patriarchy. It is no more divine than the plow or the coin. To label it holy is to confuse the Creator’s law of life with humanity’s law of ownership.
The translators who replaced “woman” with “wife” and converted “union” into “marriage” did not make an innocent mistake. They participated in the oldest kind of manipulation: the rewriting of divine truth for institutional power. By changing function into ceremony, they gave the Church and the state control over the body and the seed, over inheritance, lineage, and submission. It was not a simple word change—it was a reordering of authority. The evidence lies in the timeline itself. No honest scholar can claim that a concept born thousands of years later belongs in Genesis. The chronological impossibility exposes the motive. It was not to clarify meaning but to reshape meaning—to convert creation into control. The moment the word “wife” appears, woman becomes property. The moment “marriage” appears, divine correspondence becomes a human hierarchy. It is as if translators walked into the garden and built a courthouse beside the tree of life, declaring that all union must now be approved by them. The act is as absurd as carving Yahweh’s name into a wedding license.
Nowhere in the Hebrew breath of Genesis 1:28 or 2:24 is there a prohibition or censure of union between same-sex individuals. The verses state only the command to multiply and the description of how human reproduction functions. They do not declare that other forms of love, companionship, or devotion are forbidden. If Yahweh had intended to prohibit them, the text would say so directly. Hebrew has clear vocabulary for warning, curse, and abomination, yet none appear here. Silence in the Word is not an invitation for man to invent new boundaries; silence means the subject was never introduced.
What has happened through later centuries is that interpreters, no longer content with the text’s simplicity, have filled the silence with their own prejudice. They have written their fears and hierarchies into the margins of Scripture and then called those additions divine. But the scrolls themselves contain no such words. The joining in Genesis 2:24 is descriptive, not restrictive—it tells how life continues, not who may love. The love between two human beings, regardless of gender, is not limited by law, because the law spoken here is biological function, not moral exclusion.
It was man who invented marriage, and it was man who later declared that marriage is holy and must only be between a man and a woman. That entire structure was never mentioned, founded, or sanctified by the Father or by the Son. It emerged from human systems seeking control, not from divine instruction seeking love. The Creator of all life did not assign holiness to paperwork, nor did He restrict the capacity for affection, loyalty, or covenantal care to one biological pairing. The same breath that animates one form of life animates all others; the same image of Yahweh reflected in one union is reflected wherever love, integrity, and covenantal faithfulness dwell.
To insist that Genesis 2:24 defines holiness only within heterosexual marriage is to commit the same distortion as those who forced the words wife and marriage into the text. It is to take a passage about function and turn it into a weapon of exclusion. Such a reading is not protective of divine order—it is the anti-Christ pattern itself, for it opposes the very nature of the Word, which is life, expansion, and love without partiality. The moment humanity redefines divine love by human prejudice, it ceases to echo heaven and begins to echo empire.
In truth, the Creator never drew those dividing lines. They were drawn by interpreters defending culture, power, and fear of difference. Genesis speaks of a union that produces life, not a restriction that polices it. The verse reveals how the breath moves through bodies, not how society must organize its affections. Love remains Yahweh’s atmosphere, and every heart that abides in that atmosphere fulfills His law far more than any ceremony or contract ever could.
What Genesis reveals, when read in its original breath, is far more profound and far more sacred than any legal ritual. It shows the living symmetry of creation itself. Man and woman are not roles; they are reflections. They are not hierarchies; they are harmonies. Their joining is not a contract but a continuation. It is the same pattern that governs galaxies and seeds, the same law that makes rivers flow and stars ignite. It is divine energy completing its circuit through flesh. The “therefore” of Genesis 2:24 is Yahweh’s own logical progression—the cosmic “because” of creation. Because He designed correspondence, because He placed polarity within humanity, therefore, they join. Because He commanded multiplication, therefore, they produce. It is the law of divine cause and effect, the perpetual motion of existence. To reduce that to a ceremony is to take the engine of the universe and trade it for a wedding band. It is the difference between the roar of thunder and the click of a pen.
In the end, this is what Genesis 1:28 and 2:24 truly proclaim: that creation itself is sacred function, that union is divine architecture, that the seed of humanity carries the breath of Yahweh forward through generations. The text is the announcement of life’s engine, not religion’s ritual. And what it is not must also be heard: it is not marriage, not wife, not ceremony, not ownership. Those are the inventions of later centuries, the constructs of control dressed in the language of holiness. The true holiness is in the design itself—the law that two become to one, and life continues. The misuse of these verses is not mere misunderstanding; it is deception. It is the deliberate reshaping of divine truth to serve human power. To restore the text is to restore reality itself, to peel away three thousand years of distortion and see the living order as it was written by the hand of Yahweh.
The doorway of this revelation stands open only for a moment before it closes. What began with the breath of command now ends with the weight of clarity. The truth is unyielding: Genesis 1:28 and 2:24 are not about human contracts or ceremonies; they are about divine continuity. They are the sound of creation still speaking. The translators who replaced “woman” with “wife” did not just alter a word—they altered the human understanding of union itself. But the language of Yahweh cannot be domesticated forever. The same breath that formed the first man and woman continues to correct what was corrupted. When the text is read in its true tongue, the illusion collapses. The contract dissolves. The ceremony disappears. And what remains is the law of life, eternal and unbroken: two become to one, the breath continues, and creation never stops. The door closes on deception, and only truth stands in the garden once more.
