Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
To Whom it may concern….
“Just because you have prepared for every possible outcome doesn’t mean you know the actual individual outcome.” -Michael Walker-
That single sentence is the lens through which this entire exploration must be read. It exposes the shallowness of the flattened, popular idea of omniscience that imagines God as a cosmic answer bank holding a frozen list of facts about a prewritten future. If reality were a static reel already wound and sealed, prayer would be theatrics, love would be coercion wearing perfume, repentance would be an illusion, and covenant would be a pageant staged for a script that cannot change. But Scripture presents a God who warns and woos, who relents and restores, who partners and commissions; a God whose knowledge is not the dead possession of data but the living perfection of relational awareness. The thesis cuts to the nerve: mapping all possibilities is not the same thing as possessing the fact of a freely chosen act, and any account of divine omniscience that forgets that difference reduces both God and humanity in one stroke.
Imagine the cosmos in purely mechanical terms and you will find order enough to call it static: stars burn and exhaust their fuel according to predictable processes, planets track their ellipses, atoms jitter by law, tides rise and retreat as gravity dictates. There is grandeur here but not narrative, motion but not meaning. Now introduce creatures who genuinely choose, and the texture of existence transforms. Human free will is not a tourist wandering through a museum of fixed exhibits; it is a loom upon which new threads are thrown with every decision, altering the pattern as history unfolds. In that sense free will makes ecstatic existence dynamic: our choices are not footnotes to a finished book but sentences that push the story forward. The human presence does not merely occupy spacetime; it interweaves with it. This is why responsibility is not a metaphor and why moral choices carry consequence beyond psychology. Without choice, novelty collapses into inevitability; with choice, the world breathes.
To speak of God’s knowledge in such a living world you must begin by refusing the picture of a divine librarian cataloguing events that are already facts in some frozen vault. God is not within time counting seconds; time itself stands contingent before Him. From His vantage, beginnings and endings and midpoints do not arrive as surprises or slip away as losses. He beholds the whole field at once: every path, every branch, every counterfactual, every consequence. But to say He sees all the strands is not to say He negates the strands by seeing them, and it is not to say that strands have no authors but Him. Visibility is not causation, and knowledge is not compulsion. The perfection of His knowing consists in the exact, personal comprehension of agents and their possibilities, of character and motive, of seeds and their fruits; and the perfection of His sovereignty consists in the power to weave those free threads toward the ends He loves without vandalizing their freedom. Omniscience, then, is not a static answer key pinned to a corkboard above a motionless world; it is the flawless awareness of a living creation that God sustains and addresses and engages.
Into this vision comes the sentence that breaks simplistic accounts in half: concerning the day and hour of the consummation, not even the Son knows—only the Father. Yehoshua’s confession is not a footnote; it is a cornerstone. If “all-knowing” meant that every Person of the Godhead always possesses, in identical mode, each discrete datum that could ever be stated about any moment, then those words could never have been spoken. Instead, Yehoshua reveals that times and seasons are reserved in the Father’s authority, that knowledge itself in God is covenantal and ordered by relation and role, that revelation is not a mechanical spill of facts but an act of will. This does not demote the Son; it demotes our caricature. It shows that omniscience is higher than our abstractions: tiered without being divided, united without being flattened, purposive rather than trivial. And if even the Messiah does not parade the hour, then the mic-drop claim “God is all-knowing, end of discussion” is not a conclusion but a confession of insufficient thought.
Because the horizon of history is not a stopwatch but a will, the end is tethered to Yahweh’s decision; and because Yahweh has willed that the gospel of the kingdom be proclaimed in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, the end is also tethered to human obedience. The return of the Messiah is not a date indifferent to our choices; it is a decision of the Father aligned with the mission He has placed in our hands. Reality does not move forward by inevitability but by covenant partnership: His sovereignty and our consent, His purpose and our proclamation, His Spirit and our steps. When a person says, “If God already knows, what difference do my choices make?” the answer is: they make all the difference, because God in His wisdom has chosen to write a story in which your obedience is not ornamental but instrumental. The message does not walk to the four corners of the earth unless people freely choose to carry it, and history does not arrive at its appointed fullness apart from that choice.
This is why the difference between prediction and pattern matters. Within time, we can neither infallibly predict a friend’s every sentence nor guarantee our own, yet we come to know character and habit and tendency well enough to discern patterns. Scale that up to God’s knowledge and you have something categorically more perfect: He reads the heart as we read a book we ourselves authored; He knows our ways without coercing them and discerns the harvest contained in every seed of motive before the plant even breaks the soil. He does not need to bulldoze agency in order to govern destiny. Sovereignty here is the power to orchestrate a symphony in which the notes are truly played by free musicians and yet the composition retains coherence, theme, development, and telos. The world is not a piano roll; it is a living performance under a living Composer who can bring beauty from discord without denying the reality of each player’s contribution.
If that is the case, then prayer is not a sentimental habit but a history-moving act, and love is not a chemical event but the center of reality’s design. God’s warnings and promises, His consolations and commissions, His grief and joy, are not staged emotions for a populace watching a foregone conclusion; they are the living communication of a Father with creatures whose responses matter. When Nineveh repents and judgment is stayed, we do not witness divine fickleness; we see covenantal governance in action and the wisdom of conditional pronouncements that aim at transformation, not theatrics. When the prophets plead, when the apostles exhort, when Yehoshua weeps and prays and obeys, revelation refuses to be read as a static pageant. The God of Scripture dignifies human response, and that dignity is inseparable from the dynamics of free will.
At this point the conversation often derails under the weight of a slogan. Someone says “God is all-knowing” as if uttering the phrase were sufficient to end debate, and then they exit the stage with triumph in their own ears. But slogans are the refuge of unexamined premises. If by “all-knowing” one means a trivial inventory of facts that renders agency cosmetic, Scripture itself contradicts the inference. If by “all-knowing” one means the perfect, relational awareness of every heart and path and consequence, ordered by the Father’s authority and expressed in the Son’s obedience and the Spirit’s power, then speak on—but do not use a word to hide from the Word. The proper reply to the mic drop is calm and simple: ask what they mean by omniscience; draw their attention to Yehoshua’s own admission about the hour; distinguish knowledge from causation; show how love, covenant, and mission presuppose the reality of choice; and invite them out of the safety of slogans into the risk of relationship with the living God who actually listens and actually answers.
The practical weight of this vision is immense. If reality is dynamic because free will is real, then moral responsibility is not a posture but a physics of the soul; choices create trajectories, and patterns harden into paths that either harmonize with Yahweh’s purpose or resist it. If the gospel’s advance is bound to human obedience, then mission is not a program among programs but the artery through which history’s lifeblood moves; urgency is not anxiety but alignment. If God reads patterns, then character formation is not a private hobby but the re-engineering of likely futures; sanctification is how the Spirit alters the statistics of your tomorrow without erasing your authorship of it. And if Yahweh can weave even our failures into His design, then hope is not naïveté but the rational confidence that no free act, however crooked, lies beyond the Carpenter’s ability to set a truer line.
Objections will come, and they can be faced without flinching. “If God knows what I will do, I am not free.” Knowledge, however, is not determination; your future act is free in its moment, and it is precisely that act—freely done—that grounds the truth God knows from His vantage. “If our choices matter, God is not sovereign.” Sovereignty that must cancel freedom to be real is only insecurity with a crown; the higher sovereignty is the power to create free agents and still bring the story to the good end, an authority so deep it can rule without steamrolling. “If futures are open within time, God must be ignorant.” The debate here is over mode, not deficiency: Scripture portrays perfect wisdom, relational governance, and reserved authority over times and seasons; it requires no retreat into ignorance to confess that the Father holds the hour and the Son honors the reserve. In every case, the objection assumes that the only kind of control is mechanical control and the only kind of knowing is encyclopedic; revelation invites us to a better vocabulary.
Now return to the thesis you began with and hear the force of it in this light. It is one thing to prepare for every possible outcome; it is another to know which free choice will be made within the moment when the choice is made. To confuse those is to mistake map for journey and contingency planning for relationship. Yahweh’s omniscience is the perfection of knowing persons, not merely propositions; His sovereignty is the perfection of ruling with, not merely ruling over. The Son’s declaration that the hour is the Father’s own is not a chink in divinity but a window into how divine knowledge is ordered: relationally, covenantally, purposefully. The mission charge to proclaim to all nations is not filler content between ascension and return; it is the human side of the hinge upon which the final door swings. Reality moves when wills align.
Therefore, let the shallow mic drop be the beginning of your ministry, not the end of your patience. When someone insists on a version of omniscience that reduces life to inevitability, invite them to consider how Scripture refuses their reduction. Show them the weeping of Yehoshua, the relenting at Nineveh, the warnings that changed outcomes, the prayers that altered courses, the parables that presuppose decision, the commission that assigns responsibility, the confession that the hour is the Father’s. Explain how a static answer key would make these things ornaments on a locked door, but a living God makes them hinges. Help them see that free will is not a rebellion against God’s knowledge but the theater in which His wisdom is displayed; that love is not decorative but definitive; that prayer is not a ritual but a lever in the architecture of history; that obedience is not a checkbox but a turning of the world.
In the end the matter resolves into partnership. Yahweh does not need us to be God, yet He wills to act with us because He is love; we cannot force His hand, yet He dignifies our hands because He is Father. The universe can hum by law without us, but history cannot sing without our consent, and the song appointed for the ages is a kingdom anthem carried to the ends of the earth by people who chose to open their mouths. The Father holds the hour; the Son confesses the reserve; the Spirit empowers the mission; and we, woven into the fabric of existence, decide whether the threads we throw will tangle the pattern or adorn it. Omniscience, rightly understood, is not sterile foresight of inevitabilities but the flawless relational knowledge by which God weaves a living tapestry out of living strands. Free will, rightly honored, is not a threat to sovereignty but its most glorious theater. And the gospel, rightly carried, is not background noise to a countdown clock but the very sound by which the clock itself is wound. So take up the commission. The story waits on no stopwatch. It waits on a will—His first, and then, in answer and alignment, yours.
